Re: Attorney generals trying to shut down usenet?



On Jun 16, 6:19 pm, James Arthur <bogusabd...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[...privately or home schooled ...]
Would you exempt them from public school taxes, or,
by force, make them pay for public schools they don't use?
Isn't that imposing on their liberty in a most egregious
way?

No it isn't. My taxes go to pay for many services I will never need.
I am male so the odds of me getting pregnant are darn close to zero.
I live up a fairly major slope so if my house ever flooded we would be
in serious trouble. I don't drive on many of the highways I am forced
to pay for.


You're passing a moral judgement here: you'd decide (or
have government decide) which parents are fit to raise
their own kids. That's monstrous. Can't you see that?

It defies imagination that any parent so motivated could
be worse than the public schools, even if they tried.

You have a *very* weak imagination or you have seen only a very small
section of mankind if you can't imagine parents doing far worse than
the public schools. As a society, we take children away for seriously
bad parents all the time. Can't you imagine parents that are not bad
enough to have their children removed by only a small margin.

We decide these sorts of things all the times as a society. We don't
let bad parents impose their evil will upon their children. Someones
children are their charge not their property.


And it's not in the public interest to deny them. The
home-schoolers I've known have all been _lightyears_
ahead of their public (or private) school counterparts.

How many have you known?
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: |[IRL] Didnt we already win this fight?
    ... It's actually harder to qualify for a public school job, and the pay is much better in the public schools. ... The real reason private schools perform better overall is that they can punt out the bottom 10% of students who have no interest in learning, have severe social problems, etc. Public schools are stuck with these kids for the most part and have to spend resources on dealing with them. ... Meanwhile NO politician wants to be the one with his name on a law that starves children, no matter how reprehensible their parents are. ...
    (rec.games.frp.dnd)
  • Re: |[IRL] Didnt we already win this fight?
    ... Hungry kids don't learn. ... But if you're going to give them the money to do this (so they can ... not all families have both parents work double shifts. ... those that do have the time should not be forced to put their kids in public schools just to help out those working double shifts and those who just want free babysitters. ...
    (rec.games.frp.dnd)
  • Demand the right to make sure your children are as stupid as you are!
    ... Evangelicals intensify calls for parents to pull kids from public ... action - with parents taking their own children out of public schools ... education as hostile to religious faith and claims to be behind a surge ... additional 1 million children into homeschooling by encouraging parents ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Phoenix has landed!
    ... It is called the gasoline for fuel tax. ... Those who take motor vehicles out on the road pay for their upkeep by a tax on each gallon of fuel purchased. ... What about the folks who have no children in the public schools. ... are you pondering what I'm pondering?" ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: |[IRL] Didnt we already win this fight?
    ... actually educating them instead of just focusing on their kids ... Corp experiment, if you do throw more money at them, they do work. ... their parents are 80% more liable. ... why pay public schools to do something parents could do themselves? ...
    (rec.games.frp.dnd)