Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:52:39 -0400
John Larkin wrote:
Some famous person said :If you absolutely have to use floating point,
you don't understand the problem."
Obviously a FORTH bigot. ;)
This is right in instruments, but not e.g. in a math program, where part of the point is that you don't want to limit what the user can do. The dynamic range of any instrument is far less than that of an IEEE single-precision float.
Cheers,
Phil Hobbs
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- References:
- Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: skilambi
- Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: skilambi
- Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: John Larkin
- Fixed point Vs Floating point
- Prev by Date: Re: Attorney generals trying to shut down usenet?
- Next by Date: Re: Attorney generals trying to shut down usenet?
- Previous by thread: Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- Next by thread: Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- Index(es):
Loading