Re: OT: Post Turtle
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:27:52 -0700
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:22:05 -0700 (PDT), JeffM <jeffm_@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
John Larkin wrote:There are A FEW lines of Fed-approved *embryonic* stem cells.
There are stem cell lines available for Fed-funded research,
just no new ones.
What the Bush propaganda machine
and the incompetent corporate media don't bother to mention
is that the majority of those have been CONTAMINATED
since BEFORE the restrictions were put in place.
(PBS *has* reported it right.)
Jim Thompson wrote:
JeffM is another one of those non-thinking leftist weenie "engineers"Not that your blinders to the left bias you or anything. 8-|
who never let facts stand in the way of how they want to hate Bush.
It's turning out that non-stem cell workI'm sure you mean *embryonic* stem cells vs other types of stem cells.
is showing more medical uses than for stem cells.
...and the reason:
There's so little of the *embryonic* stuff being done
that the database is skewed.
The biologists say the embryonic stuff is MUCH more pliant.
--they just can't get their mits on it enough to show real progress.
It's all about Dubya and funding.
He's cut off funding across the entire world? That's impressive.
John
.
- References:
- OT: Post Turtle
- From: JeffM
- Re: OT: Post Turtle
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Post Turtle
- From: JeffM
- Re: OT: Post Turtle
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Post Turtle
- From: JeffM
- Re: OT: Post Turtle
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Post Turtle
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: OT: Post Turtle
- From: JeffM
- OT: Post Turtle
- Prev by Date: High current germanium diodes?
- Next by Date: Re: Attorney generals trying to shut down usenet?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Post Turtle
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Post Turtle
- Index(es):