Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: whit3rd <whit3rd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 17, 11:42 pm, JosephKK <quiettechb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
For the x86 series the FPU was brought onboard with the 486, and with
the 68020 in that series.
Alas, not the 68020, nor the 68030; it was the MC68040
that sported onboard floating point (the hardware support
for floating point on the '020 and '030 was in the form of
coprocessor compatibility).
The floating point unit was omitted on the MC68LC040,
so there were Macintoshes where a 'floating point unit'
upgrade consisted of replacing one '040 CPU with
another, more expensive one.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: JosephKK
- Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- References:
- Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: skilambi
- Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: skilambi
- Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: Phil Hobbs
- Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: Phil Hobbs
- Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- From: JosephKK
- Fixed point Vs Floating point
- Prev by Date: Re: Wideband quadrature generation
- Next by Date: Re: Wideband quadrature generation
- Previous by thread: Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- Next by thread: Re: Fixed point Vs Floating point
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|