Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: Robert Baer <robertbaer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:41:57 -0700
James Arthur wrote:
Robert Baer wrote:OOOoooohhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jim Thompson wrote:
I just answer every computer-generated question with "***-head" ;-)
In your case you could probably get the phone company to change your
number, for free.
...Jim Thompson
Changing phone numbers, having unlisted number, do-not-call list; absolutely none of that, and no combination works.
I once dreamed about making a gadget that would pick up the
phone and challenge the caller: "Hey, if you're a human,
hit the <random #> key now," then ring 'em through.
Instead I answer and if there's the slightest delay from
them--meaning it's a machine waiting to detect my voice--
I just hang up.
For a while I used another trick... you can record the three
tones from the out-of service message [1] as the out-going message
on your answering machine.
When the auto-dialer dials up it interprets the tones and marks
yours as a dead number, not to be called again. Works great,
but confuses the innocent, human callers.
Cheers,
James Arthur
~~~~~~~~~~~~
[1] "<beep1 beep2 beep3> We're sorry, but the number you have dialed is not in service." Sequence: <913.8 Hz tone> <1,370.6 Hz> <1776.7 Hz>, about 380mS each.
Sneaky as all heck!
Love it!
*THANKS* !!!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: James Arthur
- Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- References:
- OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: Charlie E .
- Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: James Arthur
- OT: abusive calls penalty
- Prev by Date: Re: Attorney generals trying to shut down usenet?
- Next by Date: Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- Next by thread: Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- Index(es):