Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:17:57 -0400
Jim Thompson wrote:
JosephKK wrote:
It is just a 1200 baud modem squawk of 10 ASCII digits.
_JUST_! How do I insert CID onto a telco line that hasn't been
answered yet?
Why not try a different approach: A 20 Hz filter to remove the ring
signal to the phones until the CID has ben checked, then bypass the
filter? The phones get the CID, then ring. Of course, this would only
work if the phone doesn't require a ring signal to trigger its CID.
--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html
If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm
Sporadic E is the Earth's aluminum foil beanie for the 'global warming'
sheep.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- References:
- OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: Charlie E .
- Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: James Arthur
- Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: JosephKK
- Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- From: Jim Thompson
- OT: abusive calls penalty
- Prev by Date: Re: Microsoft making vendors remove drivers
- Next by Date: Re: HP Refund Checks - Beware.
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- Next by thread: Re: OT: abusive calls penalty
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|