Re: See Bill Sloman, as I stated South of France being radioactive does not bother the French anymore, it is normal.
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:27:16 -0700
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 10:55:45 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
See Bill Sloman, as I stated South of France being radioactive does not bother the French anymore,
it is normal.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/a,p/20080708/ap_on_re_eu/france_nuclear_leak
It is 'only' 30000 liters of non enriched (oh well :-) ) uranium.
So if you plan a holiday to Avignon or plan to eat something produced there for the next 1000 years,
dont.
It was "Liquid containing traces of unenriched uranium" and "some of
the solution ran into two rivers." What constitutes "traces"?
Doesn't sound like armageddon to me. I doubt it will statistically
produce one milli-cancer. Natural radiation is everywhere.
Coal mines kill people, and burning coal releases radiation into the
air. People die on oil rigs. Tankers run aground. Energy is dangerous.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: 100nF vs. 0.1uF
- Next by Date: Re: 100nF vs. 0.1uF
- Previous by thread: See Bill Sloman, as I stated South of France being radioactive does not bother the French anymore, it is normal.
- Next by thread: Re: See Bill Sloman, as I stated South of France being radioactive does not bother the French anymore, it is normal.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
