Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:25:04 +0100
Jonathan Kirwan wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 03:31:01 GMT, Jonathan Kirwan
<jkirwan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
Worse, you are completely unable to defend anything on that page as
your own argument, since you remain uninformed and just cherry pick
web pages of people saying what you like hearing.
By the way, in case you wonder if I read the page, I noticed this
little snippet near some _other_ garbage I may decide to deal with at
a later time, where Mörner writes, "I have been the expert reviewer
for the IPCC, both in 2000 and last year."
__Anyone__ can be an expert reviewer for the IPCC, Graham. I'm also
an expert reviewer for the IPCC and I regularly get mails reminding me
about getting reviews in on various schedules they have in place and
am provided with access codes for their draft work. So what? The
very fact that he makes that point tells me he is already exaggerating
his position with the IPCC. An expert reviewer is nothing more than
someone who asks to be one. That's all the criteria required.
Just look at his academic record will you ?
Where are the drowning islanders ? Why did Greenpeace activists chop that
tree down if not to fake the evidence ?
Graham
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- References:
- OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- Next by Date: Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- Next by thread: Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading