Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....

In article <4877E83B.265E5F7@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Eeyore wrote:

Jonathan Kirwan wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Just look at his academic record will you ?

Where are the drowning islanders ? Why did Greenpeace activists chop that
tree down if not to fake the evidence ?

I am focused on your excessive focus on one person who happens to say
something you like,

Because he's an exceptional expert.

instead of reading up on the dozens of recent
papers on the subject.

Who receive gravy train funding. Say what the UN/IPCC want to hear and you'll
get funded. Say otherwise and you may lose your job.

The conclusion is obvious.

What about those getting money from Exxon to have a say on the matter?

Meanwhile, I see plenty of politicians needing to say what people like
to hear in order to get elected. It is a lot easier to get votes by
saying that we do not have a problem that requires conservation,
regulation, or taxation. I see multibillions to be lost by the oil
industry if people decide that driving SUVs is an environmental problem,
reduce their gasoline consumption a lot, and decrease petroleum demand
enough to let petroleum prices fall.

- Don Klipstein (don@xxxxxxxxx)
.