Re: See Bill Sloman, as I stated South of France being radioactive does not bother the French anymore, it is normal.
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 08:22:00 -0700
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:15:48 -0700, JosephKK <quiettechblue@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:21:10 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:08:46 -0700, JosephKK <quiettechblue@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:07:19 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 01:02:33 GMT, James Arthur
<bogusabdsqy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
I had a friend who lived in Opelousas, Louisiana, and he had a geiger
counter. So we walked around town looking for radiation. The local
post office, red bricks, was very hot.
That's how you find radioactive contamination: easily.
It's the chemical stuff that's insidious.
And the biologicals are worse. The most toxic and the most
carcinogenic substances known are made by bacteria and molds.
John
No, man beat them out with PCBs. (that is poly chlorinated
bi-phenyls)
PCBs are positively nutritious compared to botox or tetanus toxin. And
aflatoxin, from a common peanut mold, is far more carcinogenic than
plutonium.
John
Really? Prettyness doctors advertise doing botox injections.
The amounts used are minute.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botox
"It is possibly the most acutely toxic substance known, with a median
lethal dose of about 1 ng/kg[3], meaning that a few hundred grams
could theoretically kill every human on earth (for perspective, the
rat poison strychnine, often described as highly toxic, has an LD50 of
1,000,000 ng/kg, and would thus take about six metric tons to kill
every human).
It is also remarkably easy to come by: Clostridium spores are found in
soil practically all over the earth."
The standard 100 unit vial, as used for inter-muscular injection,
contains about 5 nanograms of toxin. One unit is one LD50 rat dose.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- See Bill Sloman, as I stated South of France being radioactive does not bother the French anymore, it is normal.
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: See Bill Sloman, as I stated South of France being radioactive does not bother the French anymore, it is normal.
- From: Jeff Liebermann
- Re: See Bill Sloman, as I stated South of France being radioactive does not bother the French anymore, it is normal.
- From: John Larkin
- Re: See Bill Sloman, as I stated South of France being radioactive does not bother the French anymore, it is normal.
- From: James Arthur
- Re: See Bill Sloman, as I stated South of France being radioactive does not bother the French anymore, it is normal.
- From: John Larkin
- Re: See Bill Sloman, as I stated South of France being radioactive does not bother the French anymore, it is normal.
- From: JosephKK
- Re: See Bill Sloman, as I stated South of France being radioactive does not bother the French anymore, it is normal.
- From: John Larkin
- Re: See Bill Sloman, as I stated South of France being radioactive does not bother the French anymore, it is normal.
- From: JosephKK
- See Bill Sloman, as I stated South of France being radioactive does not bother the French anymore, it is normal.
- Prev by Date: Re: DTV antennas?
- Next by Date: Re: DTV antennas?
- Previous by thread: Re: See Bill Sloman, as I stated South of France being radioactive does not bother the French anymore, it is normal.
- Next by thread: Re: See Bill Sloman, as I stated South of France being radioactive does not bother the French anymore, it is normal.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|