Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Jonathan Kirwan <jkirwan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:16:48 GMT
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:15:35 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jonathan Kirwan wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 08:00:17 +0000 (UTC), don@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Don
Klipstein) wrote:
According to Loehle's "corrected global temperature reconstruction"
which ends with 1925, peak of MWP was about .45 degree C warmer than 1925.
Global temperature since 1925 has warmed by more than .45 degree C.
Also see:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/12/past-reconstructions/
Funny how they like to dismiss Loehle when Mann's work was found to be riddled
with errors.
What's funny is that they aren't being dismissive, at all, but took it
seriously and dealt with it and that you don't notice the difference.
You, on the other hand, ARE dismissive.
Jon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- References:
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Don Klipstein
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- Prev by Date: Re: DTV antennas?
- Next by Date: Re: Honey, I Blew Up the Mortgage!
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- Next by thread: Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|