Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:02:54 +0100
Jonathan Kirwan wrote:
Eeyore
In comparison Loehle accepted a little peer review criticism of his work virtually
instantly and republished with minor corrections inside ~ 6 months. The interesting
thing is that the criticism of Loehle's work was in minor detail only and did not
affect its basic premise, whereas Mann's work fell totally on its head.
No, he didn't deal with several other serious objections. Just one,
if I recall.
CITE !
His proxies show a record that matches the historical record brilliantly.something that
Mann totally failed to do.
How much more do you wish to rewrite HISTORY ?
Graham
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- References:
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Don Klipstein
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: copying from Acrobat
- Next by Date: Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- Next by thread: Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- Index(es):