Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....

On Jul 15, 3:18 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Jonathan Kirwan wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Jonathan Kirwan wrote:
d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Don Klipstein) wrote:

 According to Loehle's "corrected global temperature reconstruction"
which ends with 1925, peak of MWP was about .45 degree C warmer than 1925.

 Global temperature since 1925 has warmed by more than .45 degree C.

Also see:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/12/past-reconstruc....

Funny how they like to dismiss Loehle when Mann's work was found to be riddled
with errors.

What's funny is that they aren't being dismissive, at all, but took it
seriously and dealt with it and that you don't notice the difference.
You, on the other hand, ARE dismissive.

It took AIUI a year or so of independent unfunded work to discover Mann's errors.
The IPCC HID the raw data claiming copyright.

In comparison Loehle accepted a little peer review criticism of his work virtually
instantly and republished with minor corrections inside ~ 6 months. The interesting
thing is that the criticism of Loehle's work was in minor detail only and did not
affect its basic premise, whereas Mann's work fell totally on its head.

Graham- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The IPCC doesn't have any data to hide. The IPCC does not conduct or
fund original research. It analyzes and summarizes climate research
published and funded by other bodies.

You're just making this up, now, aren't you?

.

Quantcast