Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Joerg <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:00:18 -0700
Jonathan Kirwan wrote:
[...]
If you were interested in having someone actually address themselves
to Loehle's paper through a quality peer-reviewed periodical, Loehle
will need to actually get it published in a respectable periodical
first, peer-reviewed. No one needs formally deal with something that
is just tossed out into the public, without informed review even.
Now AFAIK Loehle's paper was peer-reviewed. If we all keep saying to the guys of the other opinion that all their sources, journals, papers, scientists etc. are not credible we will never get anywhere. Certainly not to any kind of middle-ground concensus.
I could start saying the same as you did above about IPCC scientists and publications, and with what I believe good reason, but right now I won't.
BTW, no answer yet ...
[...]
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- References:
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Don Klipstein
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- Prev by Date: Re: Feckless Pelosi
- Next by Date: Re: DTV antennas?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- Next by thread: Re: OT: sea level 'rise' hmmmmm....
- Index(es):