Re: Prob. a very basic Q re: capacitors
- From: "Joel Koltner" <zapwireDASHgroups@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:09:32 -0700
"Joerg" <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eDKjk.34251$ZE5.8233@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Nope, and I would politely decline. In most of my areas of work less
reliable also means more risk and higher liability.
Not taking on jobs to do consumer electronics then, I imagine. :-)
I was curious as to your take on how much of "unreliable electronics" is due
to penny pinching and even the best engineer would have a hard time improving
the reliability (without spending more money) vs. how much of it is just due
to a lack of knowledge (in "reliable but still-coft-effective" design)...?
No boutique parts here :-)
MSP430's may not be boutiquey, but they're definitely a few notches above
Wal*Mart too. :-)
Hmm, then you might want to look for a higher quality assembler. Such as:
Thanks for the link!
---Joel
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Prob. a very basic Q re: capacitors
- From: Joerg
- Re: Prob. a very basic Q re: capacitors
- References:
- Prob. a very basic Q re: capacitors
- From: Kris Krieger
- Re: Prob. a very basic Q re: capacitors
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: Prob. a very basic Q re: capacitors
- From: Joerg
- Re: Prob. a very basic Q re: capacitors
- From: Joel Koltner
- Re: Prob. a very basic Q re: capacitors
- From: Joerg
- Prob. a very basic Q re: capacitors
- Prev by Date: Re: Prob. a very basic Q re: capacitors
- Next by Date: Re: Prob. a very basic Q re: capacitors
- Previous by thread: Re: Prob. a very basic Q re: capacitors
- Next by thread: Re: Prob. a very basic Q re: capacitors
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|