Re: another found elsewhere - AGW is fine if you're rich

James Arthur wrote:
Bit Farmer wrote:
Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:51:34 -0500, Bit Farmer wrote:
Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:09:31 -0500, Kris Krieger wrote:
How many times do I have to say it? Gore is not All People With
Environmental Concerns.
No, he's just their Omniscient Infallible Godling.

For those who need a scapegoat, he is a convenient target. Try the
National Academy of Science on for size for the same message. There are
many wizards among the electronic elite here, and wonderful and
accomplished wizards are they all. And they all have an opinion. But
qualified opinions are the rarest of the lot, and the most in need.

And if you think that there's anything "qualified" about Al Gore's opinion
about the future of the planet, then you're seriously misinformed.

Good Luck!
Rich


I was referring to the National Academy's findings.

b. Farmer

Feynman comments on the NAS in this clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f61KMw5zVhg&feature=related

James Arthur

Feynman was great! I have always enjoyed his lecture series,
both print and tape, and it was a joy to see the YouTube video.
Thanks for posting that.

b. Farmer
.

Relevant Pages