Re: An interesting view on how 'green' CFLs really are:
- From: JosephKK <quiettechblue@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:36:39 -0700
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:53:49 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
<zapwireDASHgroups@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Jim Thompson" <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:9r1294hbfcub7oopbjmsddcglt2ek8leab@xxxxxxxxxx
"Executive" care is being offered by doctors in the Phoenix area for
$1K/year. They claim the number of patients they need to see per day
has dropped by 2/3 and their income is UP.
Does that cover just seeing doctors? Or does it include some degree of lab
work, procedures, etc.?
$1k/year sounds entirely reasonable for "basic" care. Certainly many
(possibly most) businesses are spending a lot more than that on their covered
employees.
---Joel
No kidding, both me and my employer are spending about $200/mo each
for about that level of care. Of course that includes major medical
as well, which could be significant added risk.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Whatever happened to MIT ?
- Next by Date: Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- Previous by thread: Re: An interesting view on how 'green' CFLs really are:
- Next by thread: Re: An interesting view on how 'green' CFLs really are:
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
