Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere



bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote in
news:17babe10-b32f-47ee-b1d2-83e548a5c6cf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

On Aug 3, 5:39 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
bill.slo...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Obviously, any model can become unrealistic. That doesn't mean that
you can't get good information out of models, merely that you have
to be careful. The IPCC is being pretty careful.

The accuracy of their models is the very thing being recently
criticised
by Monkton.

Who gets money from Exxon-Mobil and similar sources for producing his
ill-informed scepticism.

Sucker.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen


OK, explain something to me.

We've either reached, or will soon reach, peak petroleum production -
that's what the oil experts themselves say. So that in and of itself
indicates thet alterantive energy sources need to be developed. Given
that fact, what is the payoff/reward/advantage for Exxon to refute global
warming? If petroleum is, or will soon be, on the decline, wouldn't it
be smarter for them to use all that money to instead expand out from
being "an oil company" to being "an energy company", which is what BP
claims it's doing? IOW, if oil is on the decline, Exxon will eventually
start losing profits *regardless* of any question about global warming,
so by spending money on countering global warming, ratehr than spending
it upon things taht would actually keep them in business for the long-
term, arent tehy just shooting themselves in the foot so to speak?



Also, as I've asked in the past, wouldn't CO2 be lowered if non-polluting
or less-polluting energy sources continue to be developed? ANy dope
knows that pollutants cause various sorts of harm, so why are poeple
clawing at one another over global warming, rather than using that brain-
power and human energy to counteract pollution?

Re: CO2, if planting trees helps reduce CO2, well, it *also* beautifies
and helps cool the areas where they're planted.

It just seems to me that the bickering about global warming distracts
people from taking real, current action to solve well-known
problems...and just who benefits from that, I wonder?

.



Relevant Pages

  • Its All About Green...
    ... roasted on the global warming spit have some great ideas on how to ... to pay for the weapons against climate change. ... follow the money trail to get an idea of what it's all ... A tax on carbon, at $50 a ton, released from burning coal, petroleum ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Re: Daily Mail -- What Planet are they on
    ... one version of the facts correct, in order to gain money. ... If we all know about Global warming. ... who cares what some sheep believe... ... I want to know when DOOMSday is!!? ...
    (uk.politics.misc)
  • Re: Would Someone Tell.....
    ... Like those "Professional" global warming science fiction authors you keep quoting here. ... Nither was more energy found in a drop of gas, or the engine made more efficient. ... Just feed the Chicken Littles' of the world, and watch the money roll in. ... Look Dude, I'm the guy that has to fix the pieces of shit, with pieces of shit for parts. ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)
  • Re: Its All About Green...
    ... to pay for the weapons against climate change. ... follow the money trail to get an idea of what it's all ... The AP notes that a carbon tax would boost the cost of ... living off huge grants to study global warming. ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Re: It is Freaking HOT!
    ... You do realize that is is much more difficult when the money is being ... funneled through university grants? ... made global warming, funded entirely by corporations that stand to ... Most *scientists* are liberal. ...
    (rec.martial-arts)

Loading