Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- From: don@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Don Klipstein)
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 05:14:44 +0000 (UTC)
In <7cGdnd4-555KHwvVnZ2dnUVZ_q_inZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kris Krieger wrote
in part:
bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote in
news:17babe10-b32f-47ee-b1d2-83e548a5c6cf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
On Aug 3, 5:39 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
bill.slo...@xxxxxxxx wrote:by Monkton.
Obviously, any model can become unrealistic. That doesn't mean that
you can't get good information out of models, merely that you have
to be careful. The IPCC is being pretty careful.
The accuracy of their models is the very thing being recently
criticised
Who gets money from Exxon-Mobil and similar sources for producing his
ill-informed scepticism.
OK, explain something to me.
We've either reached, or will soon reach, peak petroleum production -
that's what the oil experts themselves say. So that in and of itself
indicates thet alterantive energy sources need to be developed. Given
that fact, what is the payoff/reward/advantage for Exxon to refute global
warming?
Global warming is a reason to reduce petroleum demand. Refuting global
warming allows petroleum demand to be greater than otherwise. Higher
demand means higher price, and that means more money to be made by Exxon.
If petroleum is, or will soon be, on the decline, wouldn't it
be smarter for them to use all that money to instead expand out from
being "an oil company" to being "an energy company", which is what BP
claims it's doing? IOW, if oil is on the decline, Exxon will eventually
start losing profits *regardless* of any question about global warming,
so by spending money on countering global warming, ratehr than spending
it upon things taht would actually keep them in business for the long-
term, arent tehy just shooting themselves in the foot so to speak?
Refuting global warming means higher demand and higher prices for what
Exxon sells.
I expect that in general oil companies will largely be the ones selling
shale oil, methane from undersea methane clathrates, and synfuel from
coal liquification as soon as one can make much money in such areas.<P>
- Don Klipstein (don@xxxxxxxxx)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- From: Kris Krieger
- Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- References:
- Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- From: Kris Krieger
- Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- Next by Date: Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- Next by thread: Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading