Re: OT: NOT EVIL JUST WRONG
- From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bruere@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:13:47 +0100
Eeyore wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHMOEVRysWE
Worth 2 mins 38 secs of your time.
Graham
This about sums up the Green arguments for future energy.
Coal and gas - bad for the environment - ban them.
Hydro - can't flood pretty valleys - no more.
Wind - ugly and harm birds - ban them.
Nuclear - radiation, bombs, waste - ban them.
Solar - requires vast areas of land - uneconomical and would displace
food crops - ban them.
Solar - rooftop - OK as long as the neighbours don't object. Go to bed
when it gets dark.
Wave energy - harms fish and might cause changes in coastal erosion -
ban them
Tidal power - damages vital (for birds) wetlands - ban them.
--
Dirk
http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party
http://www.onetribe.me.uk/wordpress/?cat=5 - Our podcasts on weird stuff
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: NOT EVIL JUST WRONG
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: NOT EVIL JUST WRONG
- References:
- OT: NOT EVIL JUST WRONG
- From: Eeyore
- OT: NOT EVIL JUST WRONG
- Prev by Date: Re: Microsoft tries to polish a turd
- Next by Date: Re: Whatever happened to MIT ?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: NOT EVIL JUST WRONG
- Next by thread: Re: OT: NOT EVIL JUST WRONG
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|