Re: Digital O'scopes: Sampling Rate vs. Sample Storage Space
- From: Rich Webb <bbew.ar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:05:57 -0400
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:27:59 -0700 (PDT), "David L. Jones"
<altzone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Logic analysers are handy tools, but NOT as good a scope. You can't
beat seeing the true probed digital signal instead of a 0/1 that the
logic analyser thinks it sees.
No arguments here; o'scopes are necessary tools. On the other hand if
the threshold is set correctly then the 0/1 that the logic analyzer
thinks that it sees is the same 0/1 that the other digital devices think
that *they* see, and that can be a useful thing to see.
--
Rich Webb Norfolk, VA
.
- References:
- Digital O'scopes: Sampling Rate vs. Sample Storage Space
- From: sodaant
- Re: Digital O'scopes: Sampling Rate vs. Sample Storage Space
- From: Rich Webb
- Re: Digital O'scopes: Sampling Rate vs. Sample Storage Space
- From: Joerg
- Re: Digital O'scopes: Sampling Rate vs. Sample Storage Space
- From: David L. Jones
- Digital O'scopes: Sampling Rate vs. Sample Storage Space
- Prev by Date: Re: Variable phase shifter?
- Next by Date: Re: Differential Pair Input Noise Issue
- Previous by thread: Re: Digital O'scopes: Sampling Rate vs. Sample Storage Space
- Next by thread: Re: Digital O'scopes: Sampling Rate vs. Sample Storage Space
- Index(es):