Re: A chip too far? Where is your solution Mr Larkin?
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:24:56 -0700
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:07:51 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A chip too far? Where is your solution Mr Larkin?
http://money.cnn.com/2008/08/13/technology/microchips_copeland.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008081405
Blowing in the wind, all blowing in the wind.
1. A new programming language, accompanied with a new way of teaching
programming.
2. A new OS, which uses a nanokernel approach and wastes processors in
the name of reliability.
3. Ultimately, a new multicore cpu architecture that exerts much more
hardware control over the things that programmers tend to screw up.
The current generations of languages, programmers, methods, and OSs
are relics, and they don't scale.
It will take a long time to fix things, because the current computer
culture - academics, programmers, cpu makers, Microsoft - will fight
for its survival.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A chip too far? Where is your solution Mr Larkin?
- From: Martin Brown
- Re: A chip too far? Where is your solution Mr Larkin?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: A chip too far? Where is your solution Mr Larkin?
- References:
- A chip too far? Where is your solution Mr Larkin?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- A chip too far? Where is your solution Mr Larkin?
- Prev by Date: Re: "Frames" Question
- Next by Date: Re: "Frames" Question
- Previous by thread: A chip too far? Where is your solution Mr Larkin?
- Next by thread: Re: A chip too far? Where is your solution Mr Larkin?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|