Re: OT: interesting global warming quote found elsewhwere

In article <48AB431A.6211114A@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Eeyore wrote:

bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
bill.slo...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Eeyore > > wrote:
bill.slo...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Kris Krieger wrote:
What I find problematic is that I see people are ascribing all sorts of
very nasty motives to individuals that I just don't see as being
automatically warranted.

They are some VERY strange people about. Why are people like me and > > > >
Joerg being called 'deniers' a term more commonly associated with those who > > > > are
pro-Nazi and say the Holocaust didn't take place ? Why do they need to > > > > slur us
?

Because you are ignoring the bulk of the available evidence?

The bulk of FALSE or manufactured evidence you mean.

So you claim, without producing a shred of convincing evidence.

And don't tell me that Mann faked his data

No, he failed to take into account variability of his data with climate conditions
and then fucked up the statistics.

That's ALL. Basically WORTHLESS.

So why does it look so much like all the more recent graphs, with good
statistics?

Which looks like what ? Mann is the odd one out. NO other graph looks
like Mann's.

The others in the Wiki article on "global warming"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png

agree more than disagree with Mann.

Your favored Loehle stops short of major recent warming rather than
disputes such.

And you still haven't produced a shred of evidence to support your
calim that any of the data is faked or manufactured.

Hansen admitted to 'adjusting' the data.

So how about going by HadCRUT-3v, used by "The Register" for such an
attack apparently on Hansen? That shows significant warming.

- Don Klipstein (don@xxxxxxxxx)
.

Quantcast