Re: Sarah Palin - hot or not?
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:17:29 -0700
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 15:55:13 -0500, "Jon Slaughter"
<Jon_Slaughter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"mpm" <mpmillard@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8e777f8c-379b-41a1-bbbb-30227eb69d03@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sep 3, 11:55?pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 20:49:16 -0700, Industrial One
<inudstrial_...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think Condoleeza's got better booty but Sarah will def. get the milf
(gilf?) vote.
That was the best political speech I've ever heard. It was brilliant.
John
I think if you're a Republican (and voting for McCain anyway), that
speech was a hit.
So, no added votes there.
If you're a former Hillary supporter, that speech had nothing to do
with Hillary's value (or even women's values). So, no added votes
there either.
If you're a Democrat, that speech, as sarcastic as it was, will just
fuel the flames that Palin is not ready for prime time. If one took
that same sarcastic approach with our allies (and even our enemies to
the extent the Republicans would ever engage in meaningful discussion
with them anyway?), it is clear to me that she'll just piss them off.
Eight points in four days ain't bad:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/04/opinion/polls/main4416798.shtml
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sarah Palin - hot or not?
- From: Jon Slaughter
- Re: Sarah Palin - hot or not?
- References:
- Re: Sarah Palin - hot or not?
- From: mpm
- Re: Sarah Palin - hot or not?
- From: Jon Slaughter
- Re: Sarah Palin - hot or not?
- Prev by Date: Re: Sarah Palin - hot or not?
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Why? Using eeePC as digital photo frame with server push...
- Previous by thread: Re: Sarah Palin - hot or not?
- Next by thread: Re: Sarah Palin - hot or not?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|