OT: Retinal imaging for voting

Why not use retinal imagine + fingerprint (+ potential dna)?

By keeping a unique ID that is repeatable for each individual one can
completely prevent voter fraud(assuming a perfect device).

I'm not sure how accurate retinal imagine is but that coupled with a few
other pieces of information(maybe weight, height and photo build in which
can be reviewed in case of discrepancies) should drastically reduce the
voter fraud. It would at least put acorn out of business. I seriously doubt
dems would go for it because then they loose there "edge".

I'm not sure what the problem with all the electronic voting devices now are
but obviously they need to be designed by someone with a bit more
electronics experience.

One could keep a master computer, say, where all votes are "turned" in and
verified by a master list for registered voters...

There seems many possibilities to fix the problems but I guess no one wants
to?


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Retinal imaging for voting
    ... DNA costs far too much and takes too long. ... completely prevent voter fraud. ... verification and validation to standards that would be acceptable ... One could keep a master computer, say, where all votes are "turned" in and ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: Retinal imaging for voting
    ... I'm not sure how accurate retinal imagine is but that coupled with a few other pieces of informationshould drastically reduce the voter fraud. ... One could keep a master computer, say, where all votes are "turned" in and verified by a master list for registered voters... ... a lock only keeps honest people honest; some locks are in the category of being an attractive nuisance. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)