Re: OT: Why Obama will win... and deserves to win!

On 21 okt, 06:02, Jim Yanik <jya...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Joel Koltner" <zapwireDASHgro...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote innews:dz9Lk.198404$vK2.70853@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

"Jim Yanik" <jya...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9B3DAE3C452BAjyanikkuanet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
IMO,it's racist to be voting FOR Obama,because he has no experience
or qualifications,has serious dubious associations,is supported by
the US's enemies,and is a communist.

Jim, if you get bored some time, surf on over to snopes.com or
factcheck.org and you'll find that most of these accusations are
generally somewhere between "highly misleading" and "downright false."
 Well, at least if you want to believe snopes or factcheck, that is....
:-)

You ought to read Howard Kurtz and David Freddoso on Obama.
Particularly his links to Ayers,that Obama continues to hide and LIE about.
They have solid research on this.

The other right-wing idiots who post around here on Bill Ayers seem to
think that he is a terrorist. They seem to forget that the Weathermen
never killed or even injured an innocent bystander - they went in for
dramatic politcal gestures, not terrorism.

Factcheck.org has been busted on the NRA's anti-Obama ads;they've
demonstrated an anti-gun bias.

Like every rational human-being. But Jim Yanik isn't rational.

BTW,who determines whether Snopes and Factcheck.org are actually non-
biased?

There's no reason to vote for him EXCEPT that he's black.
(see the Imus Harlem on-the-street interviews!)

Obama's very much a wild card, IMO.  It's certainly true that he has
nowhere near the political experience than McCain does,

Not even what Palin has.(experience running things.)

Not true. If nothing else, he's run a much better campaign than
McCain.

but on the
other hand -- like McCain -- he's demonstrated the ability to work
across party lines,

What NONSENSE;Obama voted the Party line more than 90% of the time.
(when he actually voted other than "Present".)

Irrelevant. Cross-party collaboration mostly means getting together to
draft legislation that both parties can vote for. How you vote once
you've achieved this doesn't tell anybody anything about that process.

and I'd tend to give him a better shot at getting
truly unusual ideas

Like Marxist redistribution of wealth.

As opposed to Repubican redistribution, which seems to be aimed at
making the rich even richer?

Like disarming the military, like the Global Poverty Act.

Since the US spends as much on "defence" as the combined expenditure
of next ten countries down the pecking order, a certain measure of
disarmament would seem to be overdue, perhaps combined with some
inverstment in the kinds of arms that would let you win the wars that
you are fighting at the moment? A Global Poverty Act might well be
just such a weapon, though it is obviously not going to persuade a gun-
nut to cream his pants.

Yeah,those are some REALLY good ideas.....
ARE YOU INSANE??? or just in denial?

Jim Yanik does seem to be somewhat less than rational.

made into law based on his generally likable
demeanor (whereas McCain has the reputation of being more
short-tempered).

McCain is a good guy and certainly worthy of the vote, but I don't
think an Obama presidency would be/will be? anywhere nearly as bad as
many McCain supporters would have you believe.  Should be an
interesting four years, in any case...

you HAVE to be joking.
Obama will nominate liberal,socialist judges to the Supreme Court and lower
Federal courts.

Not before time. The reactionary idiots who endorsed Jeb Bush's
election-rigging in Florida in 2000 and saddled the US with an
ignorant incompetent as President for the next eight years should be
taken off the bench, impeached and sentenced to hard labour with
coercive interrogation.

http://www.ccmep.org/2002_articles/Civil_Rights/121002_coercive_interrogation.htm

They will dismantle the Constitution.

Too late. Dubbya's been there already.

Obama will have the backing of a DemocRAT Congress,perhaps even a
supermajority DemocRAT Congress able to override vetoes or block
filibusters.They already control committees that select what legislation
actually gets to a vote.

A good thing too. The Republican congressional majority from 1994 to
2006 has left the US. in a real mess - and the sub-prime crisis that
took place on their watch represents a pretty good try at wrecking the
economy of the whole planet and provoking a second Great Depression.

I think you need to take a better look at what Obama is REALLY about.
Even HE says his most important mentor was Frank Marshall Davis,a
communist,he considers Rev.Wright the 2nd most important influence in his
life(radical Black Liberation Theology,America-hater),and he worked closely
with Ayers,another communist,in advancing communist indoctrination in
schools.

Bearing in mind that "communist" in Jim-Yanik-speak merely means
"everybody who isn't as rabidly right-wing as he is", this isn't quite
a comical as it looks. It's still pretty commical.

He FAILED at the Chicago Annenberg Challenge; the Challenge's own evaluators
said there was no significant improvement in Chicago childrens school
scores,BUT,he did succeed in funnelling many millions to Ayer's communist
indoctrination efforts,in both the CAC and Woods Foundation.

One would hate to have seen the money going to any organisation that
Jim Yanik wouldn't label communist.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Pastors connected to US Presidential Candidates
    ... McCain didn't sit in his pews 20 years... ... Are you backing Obama because he's black? ... He took more of the popular vote than Dubya. ... And what do you think will happen if we get a Democrat ...
    (soc.culture.irish)
  • Re: A beautiful day in Georgia
    ... McCain's supporters combined with Huckabee's to insure that Romney ... McCain can't carry the south on his own and the South ... If all that conservative vote went to one candidate, ... What Obama lacks in experience he makes up for in the advisers that are on his team. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Obama should stonewall Hillary on Michigan and Florida
    ... Obama and doesn't want anymore of that. ... The real issue is what candidate can beat John McCain. ... Bradley believes that Clinton will stop at nothing to tear down Obama ... casting vote - should back her. ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Re: A beautiful day in Georgia
    ... McCain's supporters combined with Huckabee's to insure that Romney ... McCain can't carry the south on his own and the South ... If all that conservative vote went to one candidate, ... What Obama lacks in experience he makes up for in the advisers that are on his team. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Obama should stonewall Hillary on Michigan and Florida
    ... Rules are rules and Hillary doesn't want any caucuses in Michigan and Florida which is the only practical way to those states to vote in Democratic National Convention. ... Hillary has lost every caucus against Obama and doesn't want anymore of that. ... The real issue is what candidate can beat John McCain. ... Bradley believes that Clinton will stop at nothing to tear down Obama even if it boosts John McCain, who was confirmed last week as the Republican nominee: “The Clintons do not do long-term planning. ...
    (alt.politics.bush)