Re: Pete Lefferts LED current source
- From: Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:07:50 -0400
Tim Wescott wrote:
Walt Jung wrote:Jim Thompson wrote:On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:32:42 GMT, Walt Jung <tester3@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
John Larkin wrote:On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:25:18 -0700 (PDT), miso@xxxxxxxxx wrote:There is some misunderstanding here. I wasn't asking about an LED *driver*, but using an LED as a Vref. Like D1 in this ckt:
On Oct 21, 7:51 am, Walt Jung <test...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I had the opposite problem. We use blue led's on module front panelsI am trying to establish who and when first used an LED (RED or GRN) asLEDs were used in some audio power amps for biasing if you want a
a voltage reference to bias the base of a bipolar xstr as a current
source/sink. To my best knowledge, this was Pete Lefferts of NSC, back
in 1975.
1. Peter A. Lefferts, “LED Used as Voltage Reference Provides
Self-Compensating Temp Coefficient,” Electronic Design, Feb. 15, 1975,
pp. 92.
Comments welcome.
Walt Jung
commercial application.
An interesting side note, when the high efficiency LEDs hit the
market, some chips had difficultly driving them due to the higher "on-
voltage" (forward bias). That is, you drove them with some chips, and
the light was dimmer due to the current source running out of
compliance. When I did the MAX7219, I put in more headroom to handle
these higher voltage devices.
as VMEbus activity indicators. The early Cree SiC parts neeeded 50 mA,
so I drove them with a couple of 74F38's, 5 volts, 27 ohms. As the
blue led's kept getting better, my customers started complaining about
being blinded by them. We're down to about 4 mA now.
Which brings up another issue... for later.
Gotta go.
John
+Vs >------+--------+
| |
D1 --- .-.
\ /~~> | | R1
----- | | 1K
| '-'
| |
| |
| |<' Q1
+------|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
.-. \ /
R2 | | | Iout
10K | | \ /
'-' |
| |
Gnd ------+--------+
So you're saying the LED has a -2mV/°C TC, but a larger forward?
...Jim Thompson
Yes, that is exactly what Lefferts said in the reference cited. So the xstr Vbe then gets subtracted from the LED's Vf of 1.6-1.8V, leaving a low TC drop of ~1V across the emitter R.
Walt Jung
That may depend on the particular LED used -- I'd check if I were going to use anything other than 33 year old red LEDs.
It doesn't depend much on anything except the temperature and doping level--the current dependence is really weak. (IIRC you can get up to about -3 mV/K at picoamp bias currents.)
I've used the LED/BJT follower trick often--I first saw it in probably 1980, in an app note describing a really quiet battery-powered mic preamp. Noise is usually much more important to me than small amounts of drift, so I like using forward-biased LEDs for voltage references. You get a free pilot light out of the deal, too.
Forward-biased diodes have a noise temperature of 150K at room temperature, so if you drive it reasonably hard, you can make a really quiet voltage reference this way. (I'm sure there'll be some raised eyebrows in this group over a 'voltage reference' with 150 uV/K drift. Take it up with Maxwell's Demon.)
Cheers,
Phil Hobbs
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pete Lefferts LED current source
- From: ggherold
- Re: Pete Lefferts LED current source
- References:
- Pete Lefferts LED current source
- From: Walt Jung
- Re: Pete Lefferts LED current source
- From: miso
- Re: Pete Lefferts LED current source
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Pete Lefferts LED current source
- From: Walt Jung
- Re: Pete Lefferts LED current source
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: Pete Lefferts LED current source
- From: Walt Jung
- Re: Pete Lefferts LED current source
- From: Tim Wescott
- Pete Lefferts LED current source
- Prev by Date: Re: Brushless DC Motor controller ICs
- Next by Date: Re: Pete Lefferts LED current source
- Previous by thread: Re: Pete Lefferts LED current source
- Next by thread: Re: Pete Lefferts LED current source
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|