Re: zippers and rabits

On 10/27/08 4:55 PM, in article 6mn2o5Fhcvv3U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Phil
Allison" <philallison@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"Don Bowey = Congenital FUCKWIT "

Slow night down there MNOFDU?



Where is the multiplier (RF mixer)?

** No need for one - fool.

Any scheme that varies the amplitude of a "carrier" is a modulator.

But Amplitude Modulation, as it is conventionally known, does NOT vary the
amplitude of the carrier, Oh Mighty Nasty One From Down Under.

So why did you bring up that piece of drivel? Oh! You forgot again, right?



Neither of which is a multiplier/mixer that can generate sidebands.
Pumping
the volume up and down won't do it.


** Fraid it will do it - you dumb as dog ***, ham radio fuckwit.

You're having a *** fit cause I have a couple licenses, and all you have is
your CB thingy. Just being mad and perhaps even angry doesn't make you
right.



There are no sidebands, so no AM.

** Complete BOLLOCKS.

You're funny.



Wiggle the volume
control on that one and you could get amplitude modulation with
no electronics at all.

What you describe is simply causing a signal (the carrier) to be varied in
amplitude by changing the volume. This will not generate sidebands, so it
is not AM.


** ROTFLMAO - what a stupid moron !!

Yes, sometimes you are, but we usually ignore it until it passes.



Where is the non-linearity that will cause multiplying? You appear to be
skirting this issue.


** An amplitude modulator is classed as a " linear " circuit - fuckwit.

No, it is not. How many times do I need to explain it to you?


The only non-linearity is the FACT that it changes the amplitude of another
signal.

That's a new one, irrelevant, but new.


I believe you are attributing features and effects to audio amplifiers,
which do not exist.


** No - you brain dead colossal ham radio ASS.

** Yes - you brain fart midget CB thingy.


He know what a "linear modulator " is.

So do I. The result of AM is sidebands that are exact replicas of the
modulating signal, thus the process is called linear. But the
multiplication to achieve it is non-linear.


YOU DO NOT.

Yep, I do, you don't.


BTW - folks.

I must have told this RIDICULOUS *** the same this about 10 times
now.

There you go again..... Now write it down so you don't forget yet again.
This is only the second time. Don't embarrass yourself by doing it again.

By the way, what is your little "problem?" Did you forget to duck a
boomerang?




...... Phil


Wow, what an honor. Phil..... Gee.

.

Quantcast