Re: relays
- From: Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:09:58 -0700
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:55:21 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:45:23 -0700, Jim Thompson[snip]
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I wouldn't twist the "standardized" power-gain definition to fit this
special case. As we both well know, what matters here is simply how
much "poop" the controlling circuit must deliver on a pulse basis.
...Jim Thompson
Cripes, nobody can post a simple equation!
John
Don't overlook the fact that "poop" is a technical term with a
"definition" ;-)
...Jim Thompson
So when you design battery-powered gadgets, all you consider is peak
pulse power requirements? No concern at all for average power?
Jonh
Gawwwwd! You're worse than my grandfather for arguing for the fun of
it.
Battery-powered considerations:
(1) Energy required per "poop"
(2) "Poops" required per desired battery lifetime.
(3) Size the battery.
(4) No wonder you live in California ;-)
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
California is to Arizona as masturbation is to getting a good lay
.
- References:
- Re: relays
- From: JosephKK
- Re: relays
- From: John Larkin
- Re: relays
- From: JosephKK
- Re: relays
- From: John Larkin
- Re: relays
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: relays
- From: John Larkin
- Re: relays
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: relays
- From: John Larkin
- Re: relays
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: relays
- From: John Larkin
- Re: relays
- Prev by Date: Re: relays
- Next by Date: Re: Can anyone ID this component?
- Previous by thread: Re: relays
- Next by thread: Re: relays
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
