Re: relays
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:25:30 -0800
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:21:52 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:07:25 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:50:16 GMT, James Arthur
<bogusabdsqy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
a7yvm109gf5d1@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I was arguing at work yesterday that relays have gain. Just because
it's non-linear and electromechanical doesn't mean it has no gain. I
mean a light switch has gain if you look at the power you can control
with a finger. I think that silicon guys think gain must be linear or
continuous, and be electrical in,electrical out. I think "gain" is
much broader.
Am I right? Who owes who a beer? And on that note, could a carbon
particle microphone be so constructed that instead of a sound wave
input, I put a small headphone-style coil on one side and then arrange
it to have gain? Does a coherer have "gain"???
Ah, the basics.
100mW into a relay can switch 1kW or so, so that's a gain of
10,000, minimum.
Cheers,
James Arthur
And 200 microjoules into a latching relay can switch 4.3 megajoules
after one day. Energy gain = 22e9, averaged power gain = 22e9,
bandwidth 12 uHz.
Relays are neat.
John
Yep, relays _are_ neat, but you're tiresome ;-)
Please tell us more about leftist weenies.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: relays
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: relays
- References:
- Re: relays
- From: James Arthur
- Re: relays
- From: John Larkin
- Re: relays
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: relays
- Prev by Date: Microchip & Onsemi drop Atmel bid
- Next by Date: Re: relays
- Previous by thread: Re: relays
- Next by thread: Re: relays
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|