Re: relays
- From: John Larkin <jjSNIPlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 06:07:45 -0800
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 04:47:17 +0000, Guy Macon
<http://www.GuyMacon.com/> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
Guy Macon? Or JF. The styles are similar.
Pitiful, having to pretend to be other people to find allies.
Accusations without evidence in another transparent attempt
to distract the reader from your errors. I am not "Dr. Polemic"
and have no need to create sock puppets; questions of science
are resolved by actual evidence, not by having many allies.
This from a guy who refuses to do simple math, but prefered JFs
answers (which were wildly wrong) to mine (comfortably in the
ballpark), based on some sort of personality issues.
Did I mention "pitiful"?
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: relays
- From: John Fields
- Re: relays
- References:
- Re: relays
- From: John Larkin
- Re: relays
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: relays
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: relays
- From: John Larkin
- Re: relays
- From: Dr . Polemic
- Re: relays
- From: John Larkin
- Re: relays
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: relays
- From: John Larkin
- Re: relays
- From: Dr . Polemic
- Re: relays
- From: John Larkin
- Re: relays
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: relays
- Prev by Date: Re: relays
- Next by Date: Re: Flicker noise voltage distribution.
- Previous by thread: Re: relays
- Next by thread: Re: relays
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|