Re: OT: Hot, Flat and Crowded



Raveninghorde wrote:

don@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Don Klipstein) wrote:

Back to my question how accurate is the temperature record?

http://www.cao-rhms.ru/krut/OAO2007_12E_03.pdf

A quick google shows no critcal comment on the article.

In summary the author gives an error band of 0.7K which is greater
than the claimed temeprature increase and also shows that the change
in the last 50 years is within the expected fluctuation range.

I suspect reluctance (that I myself indulge upon) to order web browsers
to go into Russia and nearby Eastern Europe with "modern-Mafia"
hacking/spyware and lacking-and-or-corrupted law enforcement.

Meanwhile, I do say that global-HadCRUT-3v as well as "lower
troposphere determinations from satellite data" by both RSS (RSS/MSU ?)
and UAH are good enough for The Register in their "A Tale of Two
Thermometers" article.

I've read the register article at last. Seams fair to me.

To summarise: NASA are fudging their data and it is out of line with
hadcrut. Hadcrut and the satellite data basically agree.

The satellite data originally did not show global warming. Reasons
were found, circa 1998, to increase the satellite readings in line
with the ground based measurements. Presumably this explains the
close correlation between the two records.

So we have hadcrut which uses measurements of dubious accuracy. These
stations have generic "correction" factors applied to the readings.
These corrected readings agree with the satellite readings which also
have correction factors applied.

So we are ment to have confidence in a global temperature rise which
is less than the value of the correction factors?

Nicely put. Funny how temp increases are corrections and temp decreases are
anomalies eh ?

Graham


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Hot, Flat and Crowded
    ... To summarise: NASA are fudging their data and it is out of line with ... Hadcrut and the satellite data basically agree. ... stations have generic "correction" factors applied to the readings. ... These corrected readings agree with the satellite readings which also ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: Hot, Flat and Crowded
    ... To summarise: NASA are fudging their data and it is out of line with ... Hadcrut and the satellite data basically agree. ... stations have generic "correction" factors applied to the readings. ... These corrected readings agree with the satellite readings which also ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: Hot, Flat and Crowded
    ... Hadcrut and the satellite data basically agree. ... stations have generic "correction" factors applied to the readings. ... These corrected readings agree with the satellite readings which also ... Thermometers" article is currently saying rising trend of ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: Hot, Flat and Crowded
    ... I do say that global-HadCRUT-3v as well as "lower ... Hadcrut and the satellite data basically agree. ... stations have generic "correction" factors applied to the readings. ... These corrected readings agree with the satellite readings which also ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: Hot, Flat and Crowded
    ... To summarise: NASA are fudging their data and it is out of line with ... Hadcrut and the satellite data basically agree. ... stations have generic "correction" factors applied to the readings. ... These corrected readings agree with the satellite readings which also ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
Loading