Re: OT: telephone black box
- From: krw <krw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:27:30 -0600
In article <sPednQYeTJ4FRPjUnZ2dnUVZ_ojinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
robertbaer@xxxxxxxxxxxx says...>
krw wrote:
In article <7mm9m4hlimpmhjptb7ebfff7j88bmimteh@xxxxxxx>, To-Email-Any such answer attempt will not work; as marketeers that call (me)
Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...>
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:55:15 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
With "kill" based on CID I just thought of another feature:
At the 12th ring my phone rolls to voice mail. Set system for
allowing 11 rings for 800 numbers then "answer" (off hook for a few
seconds), prevents 800 crap in the voice mail ;-)
...Jim Thompson
Better yet, answer on the first ring: "This mailbox is full", then
hang-up ;-)
Even faster and lower power... Do what I do and unplug the (only)
phone and stick it in the drawer (the line is for DSL).
hang up on or before the first syllable.
Who cares? The phone is disconnected, sitting in the drawer. Let
'em call all day. Please!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: telephone black box
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: OT: telephone black box
- References:
- Re: OT: telephone black box
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: OT: telephone black box
- From: krw
- Re: OT: telephone black box
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: OT: telephone black box
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: UK okays warrantless remote hacking of PCs
- Next by Date: Re: Piddling around with more LEDs
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: telephone black box
- Next by thread: Re: OT: telephone black box
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
