Re: why not to buy a Ford



John Larkin wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
John Larkin wrote:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13772_3-10138054-52.html

You're so-o-o-o slow John... I stopped buying Ford after experiencing
a 1977 LTD :-(

...Jim Thompson

The 70's were notorious for bad American cars. Apparently most US-made
cars are now close to the Japanese in quality, and ahead of most
European stuff.

One reason Daimler dumped Chrysler was that the build quality in Chrysler
factories wasn't up to their own standards actually. And US cars can't
even begin to approach European economy levels.

Graham

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: why not to buy a Ford
    ... John Larkin wrote: ... The 70's were notorious for bad American cars. ... One reason Daimler dumped Chrysler was that the build quality in Chrysler ... even begin to approach European economy levels. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: why not to buy a Ford
    ... John Larkin wrote: ... The 70's were notorious for bad American cars. ... One reason Daimler dumped Chrysler was that the build quality in Chrysler ... even begin to approach European economy levels. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: why not to buy a Ford
    ... John Larkin wrote: ... The 70's were notorious for bad American cars. ... One reason Daimler dumped Chrysler was that the build quality in Chrysler ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: why not to buy a Ford
    ... The 70's were notorious for bad American cars. ... One reason Daimler dumped Chrysler was that the build quality in Chrysler ... even begin to approach European economy levels. ... And what engine size/type and tranmission did it have ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: why not to buy a Ford
    ... The 70's were notorious for bad American cars. ... One reason Daimler dumped Chrysler was that the build quality in Chrysler ... even begin to approach European economy levels. ... The reason we don't see British cars on most of our roads is that we ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
Loading