Re: OT: telephone black box
- From: Greegor <Greegor47@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:06:52 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 10, 5:41 pm, Robert Baer <robertb...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ahhhhhhhhh.
If i could connect my computer to a cell phone for internet service,
*AND* no have to $pay$ more than $40/month for service, not counting ISP
which MUST NOT be locked to internet access, fine.
I say "NOT locked" because Qwest DSL locks you into using whatever
service they "give" (MSN i think); ComCast does the same crap.
I have taken months to find a decent ISP; "decent" for me is (1)
Webmail and NOTHING in a e-mail (part of their browser) client, and (2)
ASCII representation - ALL HTML and Java !stripped! (or !ripped!) out.
The possible advantage is that one might even get high speed internet.
How many ISP's meet those criteria?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: telephone black box
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: OT: telephone black box
- References:
- Re: OT: telephone black box
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: OT: telephone black box
- From: krw
- Re: OT: telephone black box
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: OT: telephone black box
- From: krw
- Re: OT: telephone black box
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: OT: telephone black box
- From: krw
- Re: OT: telephone black box
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: OT: telephone black box
- Prev by Date: Re: global sea ice levels now same as levels in 1979
- Next by Date: Re: OT: telephone black box
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: telephone black box
- Next by thread: Re: OT: telephone black box
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
