Re: Why Is High Feedback Considered Bad In Audio? In Simple Terms
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky <antispam_bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:58:51 -0600
John Larkin wrote:
If a thing rings, it rings forever.
Good point.
A simple CR doesn't ring, it thuds.
Definition of thud?
Leftist weenies thud, rattle or ring. Engineers talk numbers and formulas :-)
How about this:
HPF = 1 - LPF
If LPF is rings, then HPF rings, too.
VLV
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Why Is High Feedback Considered Bad In Audio? In Simple Terms
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Why Is High Feedback Considered Bad In Audio? In Simple Terms
- From: Bob Eld
- Re: Why Is High Feedback Considered Bad In Audio? In Simple Terms
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Why Is High Feedback Considered Bad In Audio? In Simple Terms
- From: Jasen Betts
- Re: Why Is High Feedback Considered Bad In Audio? In Simple Terms
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Why Is High Feedback Considered Bad In Audio? In Simple Terms
- From: miso@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why Is High Feedback Considered Bad In Audio? In Simple Terms
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Why Is High Feedback Considered Bad In Audio? In Simple Terms
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: Why Is High Feedback Considered Bad In Audio? In Simple Terms
- From: MooseFET
- Re: Why Is High Feedback Considered Bad In Audio? In Simple Terms
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Why Is High Feedback Considered Bad In Audio? In Simple Terms
- Prev by Date: Re: New Preamble to the Constitution
- Next by Date: Re: Why Is High Feedback Considered Bad In Audio? In Simple Terms
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Is High Feedback Considered Bad In Audio? In Simple Terms
- Next by thread: Re: Why Is High Feedback Considered Bad In Audio? In Simple Terms
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|