Re: OT: Global cooling 34 million years ago


Jim Thompson wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:22:52 +0000, Raveninghorde
<raveninghorde@invalid> wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:28:00 GMT, Jon Kirwan
<jonk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:20:36 +0000, Raveninghorde
<raveninghorde@invalid> wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:56:01 GMT, Jon Kirwan
<jonk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:53:15 +0000, Raveninghorde
<raveninghorde@invalid> wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:08:14 GMT, Jon Kirwan
<jonk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:09:40 +0000, Raveninghorde
<raveninghorde@invalid> wrote:

On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:04:55 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:16:59 GMT, Jon Kirwan
<jonk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip]

Isn't it nice how Raving's ignorance makes all challenges seem
reasonable in his mind?

Jon

As a leftist weenie spewing gloom and doom, don't you think it
appropriate for you to set your affairs in order, write your will,
etc., for the sky is indeed falling... CHICKEN LITTLE :-)

...Jim Thompson

Jim, you're wrong:)

The sky is falling. That's one of the factors NASA want to
investigate. Jon won't believe it because it's a sign of global
cooling.

I see you still aren't capable of even checking out your own ideas.

As I said, people who don't really have the knowledge to know any
better bring up all manner of possible explanations, trying to say
that climate scientists haven't got it right. Not much different than
bringing up witches or Loki as an explanation. To them, it sounds
just fine. Better informed, they would change their minds.

Need to bone up on elementary math, to start, and maybe also do some
study. It won't necessarily solve any of your problems, but it may
help you do a sanity check on your conjurations.

Jon

The hottest year was 1998. Warming peaked in 2004 according to hadcrut
and we are on a cooling trend. Check.

Conclusion, CO2 does not overide other causes of temperature change as
claimed. Check.

So which bit of my logic can't you follow? I'll try and make it
simpler for you to understand.

Not to repeat myself, but I still see you still aren't capable of even
checking out your own ideas.

As I said, people who don't really have the knowledge to know any
better bring up all manner of possible explanations, trying to say
that climate scientists haven't got it right. Not much different than
bringing up witches or Loki as an explanation. To them, it sounds
just fine. Better informed, they would change their minds.

Need to bone up on elementary math, to start, and maybe also do some
study. It won't necessarily solve any of your problems, but it may
help you do a sanity check on your conjurations.

Jon

As you repeated yourself despite saying you wouldn't and did not
respond to the substance of my post I conclude you could not fault my
logic.

Why should I bother responding to any of your _new_ logic if you can't
even deal with your own _old_ logic?

Take a crack at your own comments and see how they hold up, for once.
Otherwise, I'm afraid you might even allow yourself to believe in the
easter bunny.

Jon

So you can't cope with the fact that the peak annual global
temperature was 11 years ago with a +0.5C anomaly.

This has almost halved to +0.3C since then despite CO2 rising from 368
ppmv to 384ppmv.

Data from the Hadley Centre:

http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh+sh/annual


How many more years of falling temperature will it take to convince
you the science is wrong?



When his pecker freezes and falls off. He'll not notice, though, it
was already a useless appendage ;-)


Just like his other head.


--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html

Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white listed, or I
will not see your messages.

If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Global cooling 34 million years ago
    ... for the sky is indeed falling... ... Jim, you're wrong:) ... better bring up all manner of possible explanations, ... CO2 does not overide other causes of temperature change as ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Help interfacing Current Transformers to ADC
    ... Jim Thompson wrote: ... Then using the scematic provided by Jim (If this is what you guys are ... input pin of my PIC micro. ... to get yourself "calibrated" to how the circuit works. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: WinXP and Win7
    ... Jim Thompson wrote: ... my wife has our budget pretty well worked out. ... As Jim wrote, ... But it's wood heating so that isn't a major cost ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: WinXP and Win7
    ... Jim Thompson wrote: ... my wife has our budget pretty well worked out. ... As Jim wrote, ... But it's wood heating so that isn't a major cost ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: Help! (MP3 questions)
    ... Jim wrote: ... Macintosh computers (Macs) in the UK", ... honest debate, just ignoring my arguments, blindly asserting that you ... If my explanations don't make sense, Jim, why is it that you've never ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)