Re: Nice CdS light detector in col_pic
- From: "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 05:11:48 -0400
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:10:05 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:42:06 -0400, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:05:55 -0400, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jan Panteltje wrote:
Found some LDR (CdS light dependent resistor) .. why notVery sensitive, in terms of change of resistance with exposure to light,
connect it to my col_pic project?
http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/col_pic/index.html
Now I do believe in minimum parts electronics...
so.. on PIC comparator input,
other input comparator on internal programmable Vref
- so software control; still have to write that part -,
and use PIC internal pullup to provide the current for the LDR.
But how? comp input has no pullup... So configured other input with
pullup and put inputs parallel :-)
No other parts.
Works... 200uA (measured) weak pullup is just right for those CdS cells.
So now, with this feature, it only does light when dark.
Need to program that software override..
CdS are cool, very sensitive.
but insensitive in terms of how much light you need to get an
unambiguous result--you can easily have 5:1 resistance hysteresis due to
previous history. Photodiodes run almost-almost open circuit (e.g. with
a FET buffer amp and a 10**11 ohm shunt) give a pretty nice logarithmic
curve over a wide range, and even when they start to roll over due to
high level injection, the curve is much better controlled than CdS's.
For night lights, CdS is unbeatable.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
CdS is slo-o-o-o-ow, so you can't pass any significant frequency
component thru them.
...Jim Thompson
It's slow with respect to light changes--as we discussed here awhile
back, photoconductors have gain equal to t_recomb/t_transit, i.e.
there's a linear tradeoff between gain and speed, much like avalanche
photodiodes and voltage-feedback op amps. Carrier lifetime in CdS is
very very long, so they're slow optically.
I haven't checked to see whether they're faster with respect to applied
voltage--AFAIK they're just like any other resistor that way. Certainly
they were commonly used in 1970s audio companders, so they have to
respond electrically in tens of microseconds if not faster.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
In the '60's I designed a chip utilizing CdS as the sensor, for
headlight dimming, for Guide Lamp Division of GM (*).
CdS responds _fast_ to light _application_, _slow_ to light removal,
which is just fine for headlight dimming (and compressing audio).
(*) Anderson, Indiana, garden spot of the mid-west... liveliest place
in town, fire pit at the Holiday Inn ;-)
Just be gld that it wasn't Batesville, Indiana.
As in Bates Motel ?:-)
Batesville Casket Company.
--
And another motherboard bites the dust!
.
- References:
- Nice CdS light detector in col_pic
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Nice CdS light detector in col_pic
- From: Phil Hobbs
- Re: Nice CdS light detector in col_pic
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: Nice CdS light detector in col_pic
- From: Phil Hobbs
- Re: Nice CdS light detector in col_pic
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: Nice CdS light detector in col_pic
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: Nice CdS light detector in col_pic
- From: Jim Thompson
- Nice CdS light detector in col_pic
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: dial-up "response"
- Next by Date: Surface mount, why are parts so small?
- Previous by thread: Re: Nice CdS light detector in col_pic
- Next by thread: Re: Nice CdS light detector in col_pic
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|