Re: President's Staff Idiots Trying to Kill LORAN

On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:43:29 -0700 (PDT), bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:

On Apr 10, 2:25 am, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:12:46 -0700 (PDT), o...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Quote:
According to our local paper this morning the money might rather be
spent on shooting dirt particles into the higher atmosphere to soothe
global warming. I laughed so hard that I had to hang on to my coffee mug.

End Quote:

Yet the proven technology of dumping iron dust into the ocean to
encourage algea growth and reduce co2 is ignored. Not that we need to
reduce co2,

Au contraire, we need more CO2. Plants love it.

But the plants we love to eat aren't likely do do as well with extra
CO2 as the weeds that compete with them.

---
What a load of ***.

"Aren't likely"?

Cheater, all that means is that you don't have any data to substantiate
your claim, but you want your bull*** opinion to be considered fact.

Or, maybe I'm wrong and you _do_ have or can point to some data which
lends some credibility to your wild assertion that crop plants do less
well under high CO2 concentrations than do weeds.

Got a link?
---

And the extra CO2 in the atmosphere is going to change the climate
enough that the places that we grow our food today aren't going going
to suit the plants that we grow there now,

---
"going going"?

You don't know that for a fact, and your "we" makes it seem like you
want to be considered a farmer who has some a priori knowledge about
what crops will grow where, if climate changes.

You are not and you have no clue as to how climate change will affect
agrarian activities on Earth so, ISTM, a nice cup of "Shut The *** Up"
would do wonders for your already shattered credibility.
---

and in quite a few places,
there won't be enough rain to grow anything much (though there will be
more rain elsewhere so presumably the farmers will be able to pack up
their farms and move, if there aren't too many national borders
involved.

---
So now you think you know where the rain might not fall?

How about a prediction?

Just a year, so we can track you?

Forget the easily predicted Monsoon and the rainy season in the tropical
Americas, tell us something about the rainfall in Texas.
---

Do try to develop a slightly more widely-informed opinion about this -
correcting your superficial aphorisms is getting boring.

---
Sometimes boredom comes out of ignorance.

You criticize, and yet you spew the aphorism:

"But the plants we love to eat aren't likely to do as well with extra
CO2 as the weeds that compete with them."

And cite no reference.

JF
.

Quantcast