Re: filter order
- From: ggherold@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 14, 5:19 am, Candide Voltaire <candideguev...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was wondering if the following statement is always true
The order of a passive filter consisting of only Ls,Rs and Cs can
never be higher than the number of Ls and Cs
Can anyone here confirm this or provide a counterexample
regards,
Candide
In this 'best of all possible worlds' you are correct. (As long as
you count the stray inductance and capacitance in the circuit.)
George Herold
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: filter order
- From: jd_lark
- Re: filter order
- References:
- filter order
- From: Candide Voltaire
- filter order
- Prev by Date: Re: Standard non-inverting opamp with a cap across + and - terminals...... Why?
- Next by Date: Re: LM35 data acquisition system.
- Previous by thread: Re: filter order
- Next by thread: Re: filter order
- Index(es):
Loading