Re: Any Christian Electronic Designers Here?

On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:02:30 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:37:05 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter@xxxxxxxxx>
John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:00:48 +0100, John Devereux <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

believe the whole document to be literally true, that it should be the
basis of of our laws.

It is these people I would ridicule.

Now you're talking about fundamentalist Islamists. Fine, please
ridicule them. In the USA, schools can't even mention creationist
theories, some of which are worth mentioning.

Don't be ridiculous. Creationist "theories" are complete mumbo-jumbo.

Panspermia isn't. I give it a 50:50 chance of explaining life on Earth.

The problem I have with panspermia is it's based on the premise that life
was created somewhere else and transported here. That sounds like a handy
way of evading the question, "So how did it get started in the first
place?"

I wonder, "so what made all these atoms decide to get together and reverse
entropy?"

Thanks,
Rich

.