Re: The end is in sight
- From: Bob Larter <bobbylarter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 16:47:27 +1000
bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On Apr 29, 12:43 am, James Arthur <bogusabd...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:[...]
"Progressive" Great Society programs drove the financial bubble,
which frankly pales compared to the Social Security and Medicare
fiascoes.
The US social security and medicare systems are fiascos - not because
the ideas are impracticable, since they work fine in other countries -
because American politicians don't understand the social contract
underlying the ideas, and won't implement them in a way that benefits
society as a whole.
Well said. That's exactly the problem. In the real world, it actually costs more to make sure that the 'undeserving' are excluded than it does to just pay out & accept that there's going to be some wastage. Per capita, the USA spends more money on health care than countries with free universal health care that excludes nobody. I suspect that the same is also true of the Social Security system.
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The end is in sight
- From: Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: The end is in sight
- From: Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: The end is in sight
- From: Bob Eld
- Re: The end is in sight
- From: Eeyore
- Re: The end is in sight
- Prev by Date: Re: Inductances of an Inductor
- Next by Date: Re: The end is in sight
- Previous by thread: Re: The end is in sight
- Next by thread: Re: The end is in sight
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading