Re: The end is in sight
- From: "Bob Eld" <nsmontassoc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 08:16:01 -0700
"Bob Larter" <bobbylarter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gte5ru$o3$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On Apr 29, 12:43 am, James Arthur <bogusabd...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:[...]
"Progressive" Great Society programs drove the financial bubble,
which frankly pales compared to the Social Security and Medicare
fiascoes.
The US social security and medicare systems are fiascos - not because
the ideas are impracticable, since they work fine in other countries -
because American politicians don't understand the social contract
underlying the ideas, and won't implement them in a way that benefits
society as a whole.
Well said. That's exactly the problem. In the real world, it actually
costs more to make sure that the 'undeserving' are excluded than it does
to just pay out & accept that there's going to be some wastage. Per
capita, the USA spends more money on health care than countries with
free universal health care that excludes nobody. I suspect that the same
is also true of the Social Security system.
The US spends 14% of GDP on health care while most countries with universal
care spend about 10% of GNP. The US system is inefficient and very wasteful
plus insurance companies rake profit right off of the top without actually
doing any of the health care.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The end is in sight
- From: Eeyore
- Re: The end is in sight
- From: Richard the Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: The end is in sight
- References:
- Re: The end is in sight
- From: Bob Larter
- Re: The end is in sight
- Prev by Date: Re: The end is in sight
- Next by Date: Re: May 1st
- Previous by thread: Re: The end is in sight
- Next by thread: Re: The end is in sight
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading