Re: Photodiode amplifier noise
- From: Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 15:22:14 -0400
On Sun, 03 May 2009 11:21:42 -0700, the renowned John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 03 May 2009 09:53:37 -0700, Joerg
<notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 02 May 2009 21:29:47 GMT, James Arthur
<bogusabdsqy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 02 May 2009 13:14:40 -0700, Joergwww.vishay.com/docs/70248/70248.pdf
<notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
[...]
This weekend I'm going to buy a tin of Danish sugar cookies, eat allIt's "Danish Butter cookies" :-)
the cookies, and build a pA range diode-curve measuring setup into it.
I have a bunch of LMC6001s (Ib is 10 fA typ) to use. The data***
hints somewhere in one of the app circuits that Cin is big. But it's
not specified anywhere.
Make sure to _throughly_ clean it before you build anything into it,
until wiping shows no grease residue. Else you might experience an
impressive meeting of ants in there. BTDT.
The rule seems to be that if Cin is large, don't mention it on theCin is probably largish and usually not used directly:
data***.
http://www.postech.ac.kr/ee/paust/paper_link/2007%20Development%20of%20a%20Beam-Profile%20Monitor%20for%20Cyclotron%20MC50.pdf
Interesting; that's vaguely like what I'm tying to do. But I can't
find a data*** on the JU421, even on the Vishay site, so I assume
it's another FormerFet.
Cheers,
James Arthur
Cool. Vishay didn't recognize "JU421".
Nice part for leakage, but with En=30 nv/rthz and Gm=200 uS, it's sort
of the Marching Band of Noise. This guy adds a second one in
differential mode to add bonus noise and lower the gain to boot.
Well, good luck finding one :-)
If you do it'll probably have "DoD pricing".
Why do these scientific types so love differential jfet front-ends?
In electronics they tend to hang on to stuff much longer than we do.
[...]
I hadn't paid much attention to discrete jfets in, well, some decades.
They have low transconductance, high capacitances, miserable matching,
and astounding data*** parameter spreads, like 10:1 Idss limits.
But for really low noise (like, under 1 nV/rthz) amplification of
high-impedance signals, nothing can touch them. The best fet opamps
are, like, 5x as noisy as the best jfet.
True.
Pity that most people, at
least the scientists, trend to use them wrong.
John
What wrongness have you seen? The commercial stuff for research
applications looks pretty decent to me.
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@xxxxxxxxxxxx Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Photodiode amplifier noise
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Photodiode amplifier noise
- References:
- Re: Photodiode amplifier noise
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Photodiode amplifier noise
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Photodiode amplifier noise
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Photodiode amplifier noise
- From: Joerg
- Re: Photodiode amplifier noise
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Photodiode amplifier noise
- From: James Arthur
- Re: Photodiode amplifier noise
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Photodiode amplifier noise
- From: Joerg
- Re: Photodiode amplifier noise
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Photodiode amplifier noise
- Prev by Date: Re: A pair of LM2940CT-s getting hot - is this normal?
- Next by Date: Re: Photodiode amplifier noise
- Previous by thread: Re: Photodiode amplifier noise
- Next by thread: Re: Photodiode amplifier noise
- Index(es):