Re: Microsoft's Bing is a powerful search engine

On Jun 3, 11:45 pm, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
MooseFET wrote:

On Jun 3, 7:36 am, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On a sunny day (Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:10:15 -0700 (PDT)) it happened MooseFET
<kensm...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<2ecb4f1a-e2e6-4904-ab03-1fb4cbbf6...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Jun 3, 2:49 am, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On a sunny day (Tue, 2 Jun 2009 18:59:28 -0700 (PDT)) it happened MooseFE=
T
<kensm...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<85d1497a-07bf-41e0-98fe-e49a18a78...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Jun 2, 8:15 am, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Microsoft's Bing is a powerful search engine
 http://www.bing.com/videos?FORM=ZZLH5

Just tried looking for some video stuff, cool.

Complete with 12 errors in the HTML.

I fed it into thewww.w3c.orgvalidator.

My website did not even get that test going.
My web site passed with no trouble the last time I checked it.

Good for you!

There
is obviously something wrong with yours.

Well, the purpose of my web site is to make thing available.
As it does that flawlessly in IE, Firefox, and Opera, the objective
is 100% met.

If your web site works with all currently used versions of the common
web browsers and any new versions that may be introduced in the future
then yes, your goal is met.

Anything else is bullshit that is not of my concern.

BTW your website does not meet my XXX specifications.

Should you now change it?

The W3C folks are the folks who defined the HTML standard for the
World Wide Web.  It is the standard that matters.

   I went through one of my websites a while back and fixed everything
it complained about. After that, it didn't work with current versions of
IE of firefox.  I reloaded the original HTML, and everything worked
again, so I don't give a damn about they w3 Consortium, till they get
their shit straight.


So you went through some source code and fixed all the warning while
adding some bugs and blame the warnings and not the bugs you added.

--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Firefox Alternative
    ... There are many bugs in Firefox 4 and resolving them seems to add more ... trouble and that's why they start with a clean slate with Firefox 5 and ... But they don't start with a clean slate. ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: [Full-Disclosure] To anybody whos offended by my disclosure policy-GET THIS GUYS
    ... Rafel Ivgi, The-Insider wrote: ... >There is no signed law against releasing such information and its funny ... for all of FireFox fans....FireFox has many open vulnerabilities ... No software is immune from bugs. ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: cannot telnet through a VPN tunnel using Sonic Wall routers
    ... procedure using Firefox and I have to bring up an instance of IE to ... One of the places where it shows it's firmy a windows program. ... option when right-clicking something; that bugs me. ... This message was originally posted on Usenet in plain text. ...
    (comp.unix.admin)
  • Re: cannot telnet through a VPN tunnel using Sonic Wall routers
    ... You must use something other than Firefox (which has major bugs, ... works OK from a Windows box) to save that report as an ASCII file onto ... IE on a windows box then that doesn't convince me the bugs are in FF. ...
    (comp.unix.admin)
  • Re: Firefox not closing
    ... Md Ashickur Rahman Noor wrote: ... it sometime later and get a message that firefox is already running. ... closing down ... WARNING: waitpid failed pid:3485 errno:10: file ...
    (Ubuntu)