Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:27:33 GMT
On a sunny day (Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:01:21 -0700 (PDT)) it happened
mrdarrett@xxxxxxxxx wrote in
<6e01348f-e776-4a85-8703-8f326a582ae3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On May 15, 7:34 am, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The run time in C is 13 seconds here on a 1GHz processor.
Can you specify your 'old HP computer' ?
I can win maybe 1 second by writing the code a bit different.
And a 3GHz would do it in 12 / 4 = 4 seconds...
A bigger cache would help a bit perhaps.
A Cray would be even better.
What does you C code look like? Mine is in the other posting.
Else you goofed a factor 10.
Seems to me anyways :-)
This may be of interest.
http://www.gamedev.net/reference/articles/article1698.asp
Free online version of Michael Abrash's optimization strategies.
Michael
Nice site :-)
Too bad the moron did everythin gin .pdf that loads slow and is useless in a browser.
Blame that o adobe (WTF source code in pdf??????).
So I deleted that bookmark again.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: mrdarrett
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- References:
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: mrdarrett
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- Prev by Date: Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- Next by Date: Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- Previous by thread: Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- Next by thread: Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
