Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:36:59 GMT
On a sunny day (Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:33:52 GMT) it happened Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in <h0p1r5$kv9$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On a sunny day (Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:23:44 -0700 (PDT)) it happened
mrdarrett@xxxxxxxxx wrote in
<878c405e-4556-4077-a76d-bb79cf6f4ae7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
I've got an Intel Core Duo processor here, and was surprised to see
the results of mplayer:
C:\files\per\mplayer>mplayer
MPlayer 1.0rc1-3.4.2 (C) 2000-2006 MPlayer Team
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz (Family: 6,
Model: 15, Stepping: 11)
CPUflags: MMX: 1 MMX2: 1 3DNow: 0 3DNow2: 0 SSE: 0 SSE2: 0
Compiled with runtime CPU detection.
Usage: mplayer [options] [url|path/]filename
What, no SSE or SSE2? How can that be?
My Duron 950 supports SSE in mplayer:
MPlayer 1.0pre7try2-3.3.6 (C) 2000-2005 MPlayer Team
CPU: Advanced Micro Devices Duron Spitfire (Family: 6, Stepping: 1)
Detected cache-line size is 64 bytes
CPUflags: MMX: 1 MMX2: 1 3DNow: 1 3DNow2: 1 SSE: 0 SSE2: 0
Compiled for x86 CPU with extensions: MMX MMX2 3DNow 3DNowEx
Fast as a speeding bullet!
AMD rocks :-)
Oops, correction,. no SSE either, so who needs it :-)
I think 3DNow makes it faste.
grml: ~ # cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 3
model name : AMD Duron(tm) Processor
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 959.555
cache size : 64 KB
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 1
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow
bogomips : 1920.76
clflush size : 32
.
- References:
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: mrdarrett
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: mrdarrett
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: Anssi Saari
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: mrdarrett
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- Prev by Date: Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- Next by Date: Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- Previous by thread: Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- Next by thread: Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
