Re: Extentions to BASIC
- From: Rich Grise <richgrise@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:07:04 GMT
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:13:41 -0500, AZ Nomad wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:00:48 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:40:20 -0400, Jamie
<jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dr Dun Never wrote:
Here I will introduce you to a number of new BASIC statementsI'm glad I don't use compiler languages with your thoughts in mind.
that add power to that language, and will hopefully make programming
easier for those of you who are used to discussing subjects on Usenet.
...
THIS ENDS OUR LESSON FOR TODAY
And I'm glad I don't pay to see comedy shows that this clod writes.
John
No "do what I mean, not what I say" instruction?
We need a COMEFROM statement, to help debug spaghetti code. ;-)
Cheers!
Rich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Extentions to BASIC
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: Extentions to BASIC
- References:
- Extentions to BASIC
- From: Dr Dun Never
- Re: Extentions to BASIC
- From: Jamie
- Re: Extentions to BASIC
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Extentions to BASIC
- From: AZ Nomad
- Extentions to BASIC
- Prev by Date: Re: goofy frequencies
- Next by Date: Re: goofy frequencies
- Previous by thread: Re: Extentions to BASIC
- Next by thread: Re: Extentions to BASIC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|