Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: Nobody <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 23:21:35 +0100
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:22:53 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
And BASIC? Want to talk about archaic? A language that doesn't have
structured datatypes, doesn't have block statements, can't call subprograms,
can't pass parameters to subroutines can is only good for nasty horrible
spaghetti code unless you use some proprietary extensions that haven't a
prayer of ever working on any other system?
Several vendors' BASICs do all the things you named.
The thing about Basic is that it's not frozen in time like C is. Modern
Basics can and do do all that stuff: structs, CASE, WHILE, TRY, THREAD,
formal subs, and great inherents like strings and graphics and SORT.
And I'd guess that most of it is incompatible with other Basics, and not
related to any formal standard.
C has most of this in the standard, so you can use the same code with gcc,
icc, msvc, ...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: Bob Larter
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- References:
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: Jasen Betts
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: Bob Larter
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: AZ Nomad
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: Tim Williams
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: Tim Williams
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: AZ Nomad
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- Prev by Date: Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- Next by Date: Re: Announcement for San Francisco
- Previous by thread: Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- Next by thread: Re: Larkin, Power BASIC cannot be THAT good:
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|