Re: OT: something for Sloman to think about :-)



Bill Sloman wrote:

On Aug 1, 11:44 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OT: something for Sloman to think about :-)
http://peacelegacy.org/articles/how-see-yourself-global-warming-clima...

It does provide food for thought - why would anybody go to the trouble
of producing drivel?

If compared to actual data of temperatures in the atmosphere vs the ones
predicted by the IPCC's models, all will be clear.

I think realclimate.org may have the same article plus the temp data. I found
it only the other day. Will see if I can find it again.

Meanwhile, I'll leave you with this thought.

" Al Gore and the UN's IPCC "consensus scientists" are keen to draw a
distinction (legitimate, by the way ? when used legitimately) between local,
short-term weather and global, long-term climate, when it suits their agenda.
However, the same folks who invoke this point to convince us to pay no
attention to global cooling trends are the same ones who pounce on every local
weather (and non-weather) anomaly ? drought, rain, hurricanes, tornadoes, hail
storms, toenail fungus, tooth decay, male pattern balding, stray cats, genocide
in Sudan ? as "proof" that man-made carbon dioxide is causing global warming.
"

http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech-mainmenu-30/environment/670

The AGW gravy train is slowing to a hault under the weight of pure lies.

Graham


--
due to the hugely increased level of spam please make the obvious adjustment to
my email address


.

Quantcast